|
Heavily-armed
Guard and Emergency officers at the site.
A thin line separates Spring Village residents and officers blocking
them from entering land being developed by the HDC
Photo: Shirley Bahadur.
St
Augustine MP Vasant Bharath said the Spring Village incident showed
that the Government was only paying lip service to improving agriculture.
The
bulldozing of farmers crops and the wrecking of arable lands
illustrate the Governments arrogance, recklessness and callous
disregard for the people who toil ceaselessly to put food on the
table for all of T&T, Bharath said in a release yesterday.
These
humble farmers have been producing food crops on the land for
almost 20 years.
Bharath said the Government was guilty of persecuting and abusing
a group of lawful, hardworking and, thus far, docile nationals
whose only crime was producing food.
By
Yvonne Baboolal
Armed police officers from the Guard and Emergency Branch (GEB),
soldiers and security personnel from the Housing Development Corporation
(HDC) were called out yesterday to protect an HDC contractor who
was threatened by angry residents of Spring Village, Valsayn.
This was disclosed by HDC communications officer, Leslie John,
in response to questions about the heavy presence of the officers
on Caroni (1975) Ltd lands on Bassie Extension Street which was
being developed by the corporation as a squatter relocation site.
Residents are resisting the move, claiming they were legally given
the same land in 1991 for a recreation ground. They said while
waiting on infrastructure to be put in, some residents planted
the land.
They claimed the HDC moved in last Wednesday without telling them
anything and began bulldozing the land with crops on it.
Contractor threatened
John said: We received reports that certain individuals
threatened the contractors person and equipment. The officers
were there to provide security for him.
UNC councillor for Valsayn South/Carapo, Khadijah Ameen, who urged
residents yesterday to continue protesting said: The police
stopped us from going into the land.
Dozens of agitated residents converged at the entrance to the
site, instead, and shouted at the officers and HDC security guards
blocking it.
Rambo!
they shouted as two armed GEB officers and soldiers walked into
the site.
No crops destroyed
While members of the media last week said residents showed them
coconut trees and dasheen plants destroyed by the contractor,
John said absolutely no crops were destroyed.
She said the contractor cleared only two acres of land to do soil
testing.
The
contractors has pictures of the land before he cleared it and
after and HDC personnel also visited the site to check it.
There
was even a small patch of cauliflower and the contractor made
sure he went around it.
There
was some murky, contaminated water with some crops growing in
it, however, and he cleared some of that, John said. But
the rest of the land he cleared was under natural vegetation.
Who would you believe? she asked.
Cabinet decision
It was a Cabinet decision taken a few years ago that identified
22 hectares (over 132 acres) of land in Spring Village as one
of several possible squatter relocation sites, John said.
She said squatter relocation fell under the Land Settlement Agency,
another division of the HDC.
John said as far as they were aware, no one held any lease for
the Spring Village land.
All
checks were made with the Ministry of Agriculture to see if anyone
held any lease. There is no one, she said.
However, former president of the Spring Village Council, Seeram
Mahabir claimed residents had legal rights to the land.
His proof was a letter written in July 1991 by former Caroni Ltd
chairman, Dr Ranjit Singh, to the chief administrative officer
of the St George East County Council (now the Tunapuna/Piarco
Regional Corporation.)
A part of it states: We wish to advise that, in 1972, the
company established a recreation ground on the parcel of land
to be used by the villagers.
Pending
the legal transfer of the land to the State, which will be vested
thereafter in your council, Caroni Ltd authorises your council
to undertake any improvement works on the parcel of land having
regard to the importance of the recreational facilities.
Mahabir said numerous attempts to get the ground developed were
ignored, however, and residents occupied it in the meantime by
planting it.
|